JiLL Lee-ann's profile.:.Intrication.:.PhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
02 November Self-ImagerySo, for those of you who don't know-- I am a girl. A human of the female persuasion. There are many ideas- some social, some biological, some psychological- as to what this means. There are many ideals when it comes to women, too. We like to complain about them a great deal, though if I was honest I buy into a lot of it. I'll wear things because I like to feel pretty, I'll comb my hair in the morning because I don't like the thought of people staring into a tangly mass and thinking ill of me. I don't know that there's anything wrong with loving (a partially socially defined) femininity. But there has to come a point where there becomes something sickening about defining "pretty"- something unnatural and something that drives women to distort what is God-given to what is world-loved. I have observed a few different things lately that have made me think about this more intently(being a gal, I think periodically about my distinct womanly status): 1) of course, the prevalence of pornography, or even 'soft-porn' in western society. I realize that this has much to do with the sin nature of mankind, but I can't help but notice the over-representation of the thin and well endowed on the cover of magazines in corner stores. I'm really sad that these images are being pumped into and branded on the minds of men everywhere. 2) Equally guilty: womens' mags. Must every magazine proclaim the wonders of ___ for reducing ___ on your imperfect body? Even though the above article flouts the drivel of female-targeted zines, a magazine that the same article uplifts as feminist in nature still contains links to such websites as (these deserve a point of their own): 3) Products widely marketed to "fix" us, to augment what we've got. 4) This video should be required viewing for anyone who picks up, looks through, or even glances at a fashion magazine or billboard. I think I want to look more into this campaign. I like it so far. It's tough for me to be solid in an opinion about what is appropriate to be upset about, and what is not. If two shirts in front of me are in all other things equal, I will choose the one that best flatters my body shape. If I have the choice between make-up and not, I'll often opt for a bit of powder and blush. I admire one of my roomies who puts such little stock in these things and really dislikes getting gussied up. However even she has a fantastic collection of shoes. We all have a sense of what we consider attractive or unattractive (and that's okay), but it strikes me as so inherently wrong to seek to change the very face of beauty into something inconsistent with the women who make up the population you see everyday. Watch that 'evolution' video that I linked to above. It makes me want to cry- I believe the woman was gorgeous before she even sat down in front of the camera. In response to my previous entry, (which elicited zero response from my imagined reading audience. . . kind of funny considering what I had submitted as my greatest fear within that entry) Jeremy so kindly suggested that I, in an effort to unapologetically submit a work of beauty to the public realm, take several pictures of myself. No deletions, no alteration. And post the products of my 5-minute photo session. Without explanation about why certain pics are less than flattering or bad pictures. I've yet to take him up on this offer (batteries dead in camera, too lazy to charge them), but I will, in the interim, leave you with a picture of me sans alteration. I am beautiful because I am a unique reflection of my Father in Heaven. I am his handiwork and far be it from anyone to tell me otherwise. Comments (3)
TrackbacksThe trackback URL for this entry is: http://jillsparling.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!1ADFBBFB6400F612!971.trak Weblogs that reference this entry
|
|
|