JiLL Lee-ann's profile.:.Intrication.:.PhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help
    02 November

    Self-Imagery

    So, for those of you who don't know-- I am a girl. A human of the female persuasion.

    There are many ideas- some social, some biological, some psychological- as to what this means. There are many ideals when it comes to women, too. We like to complain about them a great deal, though if I was honest I buy into a lot of it. I'll wear things because I like to feel pretty, I'll comb my hair in the morning because I don't like the thought of people staring into a tangly mass and thinking ill of me. I don't know that there's anything wrong with loving (a partially socially defined) femininity.

    But there has to come a point where there becomes something sickening about defining "pretty"- something unnatural and something that drives women to distort what is God-given to what is world-loved. I have observed a few different things lately that have made me think about this more intently(being a gal, I think periodically about my distinct womanly status):

    1) of course, the prevalence of pornography, or even 'soft-porn' in western society. I realize that this has much to do with the sin nature of mankind, but I can't help but notice the over-representation of the thin and well endowed on the cover of magazines in corner stores. I'm really sad that these images are being pumped into and branded on the minds of men everywhere.
    2) Equally guilty: womens' mags. Must every magazine proclaim the wonders of ___ for reducing ___ on your imperfect body? Even though the above article flouts the drivel of female-targeted zines, a magazine that the same article uplifts as feminist in nature still contains links to such websites as (these deserve a point of their own):
    3) Products widely marketed to "fix" us, to augment what we've got.
    4) This video should be required viewing for anyone who picks up, looks through, or even glances at a fashion magazine or billboard. I think I want to look more into this campaign. I like it so far.

    It's tough for me to be solid in an opinion about what is appropriate to be upset about, and what is not. If two shirts in front of me are in all other things equal, I will choose the one that best flatters my body shape. If I have the choice between make-up and not, I'll often opt for a bit of powder and blush. I admire one of my roomies who puts such little stock in these things and really dislikes getting gussied up. However even she has a fantastic collection of shoes. We all have a sense of what we consider attractive or unattractive (and that's okay), but it strikes me as so inherently wrong to seek to change the very face of beauty into something inconsistent with the women who make up the population you see everyday. Watch that 'evolution' video that I linked to above. It makes me want to cry- I believe the woman was gorgeous before she even sat down in front of the camera.

    In response to my previous entry, (which elicited zero response from my imagined reading audience. . . kind of funny considering what I had submitted as my greatest fear within that entry) Jeremy so kindly suggested that I, in an effort to unapologetically submit a work of beauty to the public realm, take several pictures of myself. No deletions, no alteration. And post the products of my 5-minute photo session. Without explanation about why certain pics are less than flattering or bad pictures. I've yet to take him up on this offer (batteries dead in camera, too lazy to charge them), but I will, in the interim, leave you with a picture of me sans alteration. I am beautiful because I am a unique reflection of my Father in Heaven. I am his handiwork and far be it from anyone to tell me otherwise.

    Comments (3)

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up

    JiLL Lee-annwrote:
    Branch? I'm attending a Baptist church at the moment :).
    22 Jan.
    Bobwrote:
    Yup this world is messed up. An interesting sociological fact: a women's ideal bodyshape is skinnier than men's ideal
    bodyshape of women. So women, stop stressing, ironically you're strived for ideal is less attractive.
    So what "branch" of christianity are you with?
    23 Dec.
    Caitwrote:
    Lots to mull over here, as usual! I do have quite a few qualms with society's definition of the two sexes, some of which are perhaps unwarranted. I am quite bothered by guys frequent qualifications of girls as "hot" or other rather one-dimensional assessments of beauty. However, I am quite content to observe the prettiness of certain boys, or expound excessively on the loveliness of a guy's cheekbones to a friend. Hypocritical? I think so. But that doesn't mean it's OK to allow the defining factor of members of our society to be determined by their height, build, skin tone, nose profile, eyebrow shape, and other absurd features.

    While I can be reactionary to society's definitions of what it means to be a woman, I do think that there is much that could be improved. Sooo many studies in psychology and sociology that we discuss in class have suggested time and time again that our cultures expectations and perceptions of females are at best unrealistic. This results in girls' insatiable quests to achieve some ideal of "beauty," and limits our ability to appreciate true beauty.

    I love clothes. I love blow drying my hair. I love painting my nails red. I love wearing a little black dress with lipstick and dancing around to "Girls Just Wanna Have Fun" in my basement while eating the cookies I just baked from a Martha Stuart recipe. But that doesn't mean I should need a form-fitting dress, some makeup, and superb domestic abilities to know that I am lovable and beautiful. It just means that I, as an individual who happens to be a girl, enjoy these things, and try not to do them for someone else.

    My cousin James loves to bake. My friend Caitlin grows her leg hair for miles and miles. My old Sunday School student Ben adores wearing beads and scarves. My auntie Anne plays really rough hockey every Wednesday night in the winter. My dad cries a river every time we watch a sappy movie. Crystal despises wearing fancy dresses with a passion that I've never encountered.  And that's fine. In fact, it's lovely, because they're experiencing what it means to embrace what God made them as, and living that out rather than some societal ideal. That, to me, is beauty. I'm glad you appreciate that too.

    Christians really irk me the most when it comes to gender-related things. But that's a thought for another day, when I'm not studying for a midterm! For now, I'm content to concur with the thoughtful points brought up in your entry, and continue to enjoy the Dove campaign. Although their ad is being put out basically so they can sell some more bars of soap, it's advertising that I can admire, be inspired by, and support. I'm sorry for writing an extended rant on your blog Jill; there's more to say, and this is kind of incomplete and hurried, but this post was too good to delay commenting on (as I did with your last entry...).

    You are truly beautiful, Jill. You are fully loved.

    P.S. I'm saddened to hear that Blogger is being such a pain for you! I promise it isn't usually; it's beginner's bad luck I suppose. Whether on Spaces or Blogger though, I'll continue to enjoy what you courageously put down on that terrifying white.

    P.P.S. The link you e-mailed was positively delightful. Long live the moustache!
    3 Nov.

    Trackbacks

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://jillsparling.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!1ADFBBFB6400F612!971.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None